Ralph Lauren Corp. tried to drag the wool over the eyes of shoppers who purchased considered one of their expensive sweaters, a girl claims in a class-action lawsuit.
The sweater saga started in November 2019 when Texas resident Gloria Miramontes purchased a girls’s burgundy light-weight V-neck from a Ralph Lauren Polo Factory retailer in El Paso.
Miramontes believed the sweater was made completely of pima cotton primarily based on the tags, which boasted, “Fine luxurious yarns crafted from Pima Cotton fibers distinguish this signature design, knit in a fine gauge stitch for lightweight comfort and an exquisitely soft hand,” court docket paperwork present.
Pima cotton is a higher-end product with a longer fiber than typical cotton. It has a repute for producing a clean cloth that’s delicate to the contact, wrinkle-resistant, and ultra-durable.
But customers had been short-changed, the Manhattan Federal Court lawsuit alleges, as a result of the fibers within the sweater had been a number of tenths of an inch too quick to be pima, which the US Department of Agriculture measures at 1.3125 inches lengthy on common.
The V-neck sweater is bought at hundreds of areas.Getty Images
Lab checks proved the Ralph Lauren sweaters weren’t 100% pima cotton, mentioned Miramontes’ lawyer, Spencer Sheehan.
Miramontes claims she wouldn’t have forked over $39.99 if she had identified it was not totally pima, the swimsuit says.
Pima cotton is usually dearer, so “there is great incentive to mix cotton byproducts and shorter fibers with higher value longer fibers,” in line with the court docket papers, which had been filed in New York primarily based on the Manhattan location of Polo’s headquarters, plaintiff’s attorneys mentioned.
Lab checks proved the garment was really not 100% Pima cotton, an lawyer mentioned.Spencer Sheehan
The Lauren V-neck sweater was bought in “thousands of locations,” in line with the $5 million class motion lawsuit, which incorporates prospects from 19 states, together with New York.
The Ralph Lauren Corp. declined remark. Lauren is just not named individually as a defendant.